The competition problem syllabus and evaluation domains
3-5
students per roster
72 hr
problem release window
3 rounds
peer-reviewed scoring




Theoretical derivation manuscripts
Manuscripts must be submitted in LaTeX format. Scoring rewards analytical validity, dimensional analysis rigor, and clear physical intuition without approximation shortcuts.
Computational code implementation
Open-source numerical implementation in Python, Julia, or C++. Repositories require automated test scripts, reproducible notebooks, and comprehensive error propagation analysis.


Experimental datasets for simulation
Competitors receive raw sensor output and calibration telemetry collected from controlled laboratory apparatus. Models must match experimental boundary conditions within a strict four-sigma tolerance.
Calibration constants are updated dynamically upon problem release to prevent pre-computed solutions and test authentic real-time mathematical adaptation.
Peer-reviewed evaluation metrics
Evaluators score submissions using a double-blind rubric emphasizing mathematical validity and reproducibility. Each derivation is assessed independently by two faculty advisors from partner institutions, resolving discrepancies through standardized error-bound analysis.
Final scores are published on the administrative ledger following inter-university consortium review. Late submissions or repositories failing continuous integration checks are logged automatically and disqualified without exception.
